In late July, the C.D.C. revealed the document, Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings. In short, an owners manual for gently isolating citizens in quarantine camps.
The opening lines of the document states: “This document presents considerations from the perspective of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) for implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps, displaced populations and low-resource settings.1,2 This approach has never been documented (other than WWII, among others) and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings.”
The document continues explaining what the Shielding Approach would entail: “The shielding approach aims to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (“high-risk”) and the general population (“low-risk”). High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting.1,2 They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.”
“… In most humanitarian settings, older population groups make up a small percentage of the total population.4,5 For this reason, the shielding approach suggests physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population to prioritize the use of the limited available resources and avoid implementing long-term containment measures among the general population.”
The chart above outlines just how insanely tyrannical Shielding Approach would be. Even the most basic level, Household (HH) Level, is basically a room that lock any high-risk individuals. Low-risk HH members cannot enter the room, only healthy individuals along with protocol. First, how would they ever enforce this? Second, if other members in the house are considered low-risk, the still should not enter. This implies only outside medical professionals or “healthy people” can enter the room. Who’s going to feed them? If the elderly are the highest risk, they are also likely to need daily assistance.
Neighborhood Level raises further concerns: “A designated shelter/group of shelters (max 5-10 households), within a small camp or area where high-risk members are grouped together. Neighbors “swap” households to accommodate high-risk individuals.”
A group of households dedicated to holding hi-risk individuals. Or a small camp? Neighbors will swap households to accommodate? This is absolute madness. Your home will be turned into a sick ward while you are forced to live elsewhere. BUT WAIT, that is not even as bad as it could be we haven’t even got to the isolation camps of large size.
“A group of shelters such as schools, community buildings within a camp/sector (max 50 high-risk individuals per single green zone) where high-risk individuals are physically isolated together. One entry point is used for exchange of food, supplies, etc. A meeting area is used for residents and visitors to interact while practicing physical distancing (2 meters). No movement into or outside the green zone.”
The protocol proposed by the C.D.C. is a massive violation of human rights and if these measures are implemented, it will result in a complete air tight medical police state of permanent tyranny and ritual death.
The entire document can be found here. Please contact your representatives and demand they push back against complete overreach of unelected government officials as well as the elected.